terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012

avaliação de desempenho docente... (des)acordos pelos 'states'... (im)posições [de carnaval] por cá... questões de [não]negociação e estatuto...por cá...!

hoje foi dado à estampa... isto e isto...! certamente uma publicação intempestiva de leis...

por cá as coisas correm de mansinho... como é conveniente neste 'carnis valles' [de crise]...

pelos 'states' é assim, como também, agora, outrossim:

"In New York, the politicians, the union leaders, and the media are all exchanging high fives over last week's agreement about teacher evaluation. Gov. Andrew Cuomo took credit for forcing the parties to settle. But it's a dark day when politicians impose an untested scheme on educators, despite a wealth of evidence that these schemes are inaccurate, unstable, and have negative consequences and no evidence that they improve education. See this and this. If we were serious about improving education for all children, we would take a broader view of the causes of and remedies for low achievement. 

But the politicians have decided to solve our education problems not by looking at root causes but by firing teachers. They feel certain that we can fire our way to the top. In 2010, New York won a Race to the Top award of $700 million. To obtain this money—very little, if any, of which will ever reach any classroom or student—New York said it would devise a teacher evaluation plan that was based in part on student test scores. Although this idea finds little support among testing experts, it is an obsession with the current U.S. Department of Education. The winning New York proposal, in order to get the support of the teachers' unions, said that 20 percent of teachers' evaluations would be tied to student scores."

aqui.

Sem comentários:

Enviar um comentário